Granville Community Calendar

02/22/98

BOARD'O. F ZONING AND>B'UILDING APPEALS-7-' '- 1:'r= 9.
January 22, 1998
Minutes
Present: Ashlin Caravana, Bob Essman, Lon Herman, Greg Sharkey,
Eric Stewart
Members Absent:
Also Present: Reza Reyazi, Village Planner
Visitors: Gary Stansbury, Clark Shai
Minutes: December 18:
Page 2, line 2, change to: ".
whether they had to do that."
told that they didn' t know
MR. STEWART MOVED TO APPROVE MINUTES AS AMEMDED; MR SHARKEY
SECONDED, AND MINUTES WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Citizens Comments: None
MR. HERMAN MOVED TO FLIP THE OLD AND NEW BUSINESS ON THE
AGENDA TO EXPEDITE THE PROCESS FOR THE APPLICANT. MR.
SHARKEY SECONDED, AND MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
New Business:
Gary and Judy Stansbury, 660 West Broadway
The applicants wish to replace the one-car garage and car- pthoert with a new 24' x24' one-story two-car garage in approximately same location. The current garage is 6' from west property line. Mr. Stansbury showed pictures of the project and stated that two neighbors have submitted letters of approval. Another neighbor, Clarke Shai, was present and indicated his approval of the application.
MR. SHARKEY MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SIDE YARD SETBACK. MR. ESSMAN SECONDED, AND MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
this aMpr.plSichaatrikoeny: applied the criteria for variances (1147. 03) for
A) That special circumstances or conditions exist which are peculiar to the land or structure(s) involved and which are not applicablecto other lands or structures in the same zoning wdiitshtriitcst.sidTehw4 aslkpecial circumstances would be that the garage sited is already there and the replacement will be at the spot where the old garage stood for many years.
B) That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this Zoning Ordinance would deprive the applicants of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the
Alprovisions
of this Ordinance. If applicant was required to
adhere to the ordinance, he would have to relocate the structure
and sidewalk.
C) That the special conditions and circumstances do not
result from the actions of the applicant. The applicant purchased
the property as is and the garage has been there for a
number of years.
D) That the granting of the variance will not confer on
the applicant any undue privilege that is denied by this
Ordinance to other lands or structures in the same zoning district. We have heard no objections about the application and
do not believe there is any undue privilege. Others in the
neighborhood have garages within the required setback.
E) That the granting of the variance will in no other
manner adversely affect the health, safety and general the welfare of persons residing or working within the vicinity of the proposed variance. We have heard no evidence or testimony from neighbors in objection. To the contrary, we have heard from Mr.
Shai and others who have submitted affadavits that they have no obj ection to the proposed proj ect., 1
Old Business:
FToinmd F'inuglleorf and Village Brewing Company, 128 East Broadway - Fact
After a few editorial comments made by BZBA members, Ms. Caravana stated she will retype the Finding of Fact for the application approved at the last meeting.
MS. CARAVANA MOVED TO ADOPT THE FINDING OF FACT AS AMENDED AS OFFICIAL DECISION OF THE BOARD UNDER SECTIONS 1159. 03 AND 1147. 03 OF THE CODE. MR. SHARKEY SECONDED, AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Adjournment: 7: 30 p. m.
Next Meetings: February 26, 1998, 7: 00 p. m.
Respectfully submitted,
Betty Allen
2

Employee Payroll / Compensation

The Village has thirty-six (36) full-time employees, 16 regular part-time employees and seaonal employees. Village Personnel Policy

Go to My Pay Stub and login.