GRANVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
July 28, 1997
Members Present: Peter Marshall (for Maxine Montgomery), Keith
WMyilekres,nfLeyldn Robertson, Richard Salvage, Gary Stansbury, Carl
Also Present: Reza Reyazi, Village Planner
Visitors Present: Scott Rawdon (Sentinel),Brian and Stephanie Parsley
Minutes of July 14, 1997:
Page 1: Third paragraph f rom bottom, change to: "Mr. S tansbury thought not all businesses there want signs. He is concerned about
precedent-setting and_g_rantingm_ore-S_ZAare footage than allowed by code. . ."Under first Morrison paragraph, last sentence, "The
sandwich board is not counted as maximum signage." Page 2: The first motion, " . . a .nd motion was unanimously
approved with some members' reluctance."
Page 3: line 1, "Mr. Stansbury stated that since Ms. Shurtz is not present to explain her signs and the signs violate the zoning tcohdeeamnd ,th. e. fa."ct that she never received permission to erect Next to last paragraph, " Ms. Robertson asked Mr.
Miller to explain the application in architectural terms and about the columns on the east side,. . ."
Page 4: third paragraph, "In answer to further cruestioning. "
End of Sth paragraph, 3"0 per cent, the total lot coverage allowed by code." Last paragraph: "Mr. Reyazi stated that the application
was received before_ the_Moratorium and was scheduled to be heard durinELth- e_Moratoriubmut--Mr.W_oodswanted_to- _makesome changes . " Page 5, paragraph 4, "lights hang down 8"."
MR. WILKENFELD MOVED TO APPROVE MINUTES AS CORRECTED AND MR. MYERS SECONDED. MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Citizens Comments: None.
Gloria Hoover, 213 East College Street
Ms. Hoover wishes to replace the slate roof with shingles and has been granted emergency permission by the Village Manager to begin repairs since the roof was leaking. Replacement of slate is beyond affordability, and Ms. Hoover will match the slate with material and color as similar as possible to existing material. Mclra. rSiftyantshbiusrywaisthked about the four roof vents, and Mr. Reyazi will Ms. Hoover. Most of the repairs are to the back of the house and not visible.to the street.
MR. MYERS MOVED TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION WITH THE STIPULATION
THAT THE REPAIRS NOT BE VISIBLE TO THE STREET. MS.
ROBERTSON SECONDED, AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Jonathan Bridge, 516 West Broadway
Mr. Bridge steps wishes to replace the concrete steps-w· i·th wood" of the. same size and in the same location. The lattice will extend along the side to look like the rest of the house. Although this would be in the TCOD, lesser setbacks have reduced setbacks in similar built-up areas.
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATION; MS. ROBERTSON SECONDED, AND MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Brian and Stephanie Parsley, 316 West Maple Street
The Parsleys wish to carry out extensive repairs and renova- tions to the house and property and summarized their plans as Part of the application with photos and drawings. Following Mr. Par- sley' s explanation, GPC members discussed the 17 items one by one and had a few questions:
No. 5. Mr. Wilkenfeld wondered what the enclosed carport would look like with knee walls and trellis panels. Mr. Parsley said that they would be 2"x3" strips about 2' in from each post suspended by eyehooks and held in place at bottom. look No. 9. The shingle style is 3-tab style shaded and colored. to like slate.
No. 13. Mr. Parsley thinks vertical siding, rather than horizoNon.tal, would add character to the look of the garage. 15. The pickets of the fence are to be on the outside facing neighbors.
No. 16. Applicant will replace the three trees to be removed. No. 17. There are now shrubs at the location where the air uconnitdiftrioomnetrhewill be placed, and Mr. parsley plans to screen the street.
MS. ROBERTSON MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATION AS SUBMITTED; MR. SALVAGE SECONDED, AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Greg and Ginny Sharkey, 117 South Plum Street
of theThheouSshea.rkeys wish to build a 64-sq. ft. wooden deck on the back for They have received BZBA approval for the variance insufficient setbacks, as the back of the house is 6' from the rear lot line and 12' from north lot line. The nearest trails on Sugarloaf Park, the neighbor, are about 25-30' from the deck. The deck will not be visible from the street. This plan is consistent with other decks in the district.
MS ROBERTSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION. MR.
WILKENFELD SECONDED, AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Douglas and Connie Kramer, 120 South Mulberry Street
Although GPC approved the Akistie door on their plans recently, the applicants now wish to. substitute a single door in order to get
more light into the house. The question was whether this consti- tuted a substantial members agreed change over the original application-, and that it was not substantial.
MR. MYERS MOVED TO AMEND THE FINDING OF FACT TO CHANGE THE
N19MH DOUBLE DOOR TO A NEWPORT II SINGLE DOOR; MR. WILKENFELD SECONDED, AND MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
First Presbyterian Church, 110 West Broadway
Mr. Reyazi stated that John Reagan, architect, will be present caht utrhceh.August 11 GPC meeting to talk about the design of the He will consult with Mr. Miller beforehand and provide a written report in advance.
Kathy Shurtz, Shepardson Condominiums
Ms. Shurtz had planned to be present to discuss alternatives to her "No Trespassing" signs in a residential district, which was denied at the last meeting, but she was absent. Mr. Reyazi said the signs are still up and she must take them down.
Having received some complaints about the vending machines at Bennett' s and IGA, Mr. Reyazi wanted to discuss the policy adopted in 1996. Being considered as signs, any change must be in compli- ance with sign ordinances. These machines have been there for a long time, and Ms. Robertson reminded the group that any change in any sign means it must be in compliance with regulations. Mr. Marshall stated that the signs are owned by the vending machine company and the property owner pays a certain percentage of income to him. Mr. Salvage thought this policy would not include other signs at a business.
Mr. Reyazi wants to photograph vending machines and tell the Poeple involved that this is the policy and if they change any- thing, consider themselves notified in advande. Any new machines require approval.
Rules and Regulations for GPC."
into Changes discussed at the last meeting have been incorporated the new draft. Other changes discussed tonight were:
I. C. 1. Mr. Marshall said that a person should be removed from GPC for a certain number of unexcused absences, but Mr. Reyazi said Mr. Hurst did not want that stated because the charter would have to be changed. Mr. Salvage wanted Mr. Reyazi to check with Mr. Hurst about the language in this section.
II. C. Change 24 hours to 48 hours.
VIII. B. occurs. Change the word 'case' to 'application' wherever it
VIII. C and E. Reverse these two.
VIII. F. Mr. Reyazi will check with Mr. Hurst about swearing in a person who wants to give evidence and about the difference between a Public Hearing and a Hearing. In a Hearing for a zoning Certificate, neighbors do not need to be notified. Mr. Marshall added that appeal hearings are held in public but are not public hearings; people have to speak during Citizens' Comments. Ms. Robertson stated that a PUD application changes the zoning code so it is necessary to have a public hearing.
Finding of Fact:
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO ADOPT THE· APPLICATIONS FOR HOOVER,
BRIDGE, PARSLEY, SHARKEY, AND REVISION FOR KRAMER AS FORMAL FINDING OF FACT; MR. WILKENFELD SECONDED AND FINDINGS OF FACT WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
9: 10 P. m.
August 11 and August 25