GRANVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
October 5, 1998
MWeimllibaemrs Present: Jack Burriss, Richard Salvage, Gary Stansbury, Wernet, Carl Wilkenfeld
Members Absent: Keith Myers
Also Present: Kathryn Wimberger, Village Planner Visitors Present: Scott Rawdon S( entinel)K, atherine Wirtz, Tony and Luann Barsotti, Joan Hepsworth, Carolyn Carter, Ken and Penny Richards, Trudy Knox, John Thornborough, Jim Harf
Minutes of September 14, again: Page 1, Shumway application, Ms. mWoimvebde. rger stated that three shrubs were removed, rather than
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO APPROVE MINUTES AS CORRECTED; MR. WILKENFELD SECONDED, AND MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Minutes of September 28 are not prepared yet.
Citizens Comments: None
Luann and Anthony Barsotti, Jr.,344 East Maple Street
The applicant stated that two years ago he came in for a permit for vinyl siding but could not do it then; now he wants gray and white siding with slight texture to match existing siding. All other things remain the same. He would keep the fishscale siding.
Mr. Burriss asked about the porch pillars and was told they would be wrapped in aluminum and the capitals would go. The half columns against the house would be boxed also. Mr. Burriss
thought the columns complemented the fishscale and would hate to
see them go or to be boxed. It' s important to maintain the origi- nal integrity of the facade. Mr. Barsotti is willing to change
the design. There would be a gable vent in a diamond shape on both ends of house.
MR. BURRISS MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATION WITH AMENDMENTS:
1) COLUMNS OF PORCH NOT BE ENCLOSED; (2) TRIANGULAR VENT BE
COVERED IN APPROPRIATE SIDING MATERIAL; (3) FURTHER ADDITION
TO THE PROPOSAL, WE PROVIDE FOR ALLOWING A MEMBRANE ROOF,
BLACK IN COLOR, BE APPLIED TO THE ROOF OF THE PORCH. MR.
WILKENFELD SECONDED, AND MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Louise M. Daniels, 125 East College Street
Ms. Daniels would like to enclose the front porch with glass
and aluminum. The existing posts may or may not remain, depending
on their internal stability. The porch would have horizontal
sliding panels with screens covering half the window.
Mr. Stansbury asked whether the kneewall would remain and
she replied yes and it would be lower. There is a space between
the railing and the floor. Mr. Burris large picture window was concerned about the addition is balancing with the new porch windows. The to work more modern than the house but could be articulated their coanndditihoen.would like the pillars intact, but that depends on
Mr. Wernet was concerned about the lack of horizontal breaks Bonurtrhisesnew windows, which would enhance the appearance, and Mr. said other windows are doubleh-ung, and he would feel more comfortable witn the new windows broken up in some way. Mr. Wilkenfeld suggested horizontal siding. Mr. Salvage would like to see a sample of material, and Mr. Burriss wants the roof not to change and wants the shrubs to remain. He is not
comfortable with the modern appearance. Members wanted to see drawings further describing this plan and how it would fit in with the rest of the house. Ms. Wimberger will work with Ms. Daniels to come up with revised plans after the latter talks with her builder.
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO TABLE APPLICATION PENDING RECEIPT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. MR. WILKENFELD SECONDED, AND MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
James Crates and Stephanie Gussler, 339 East Maple Street
The applicants wish to raise the roof over the rear of the house to utilize space above the kitchen and make less expanse of roof. It will be of barn siding and have one double-paned window. On the back they would have another window. The front
facade will be equal with the wall to the west.
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATION AS SUBMITTED. MR.
WILKENFELD SECONDED, AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Roger L. Coombs, 218 East Maple Street
Since the applicant was absent and members had questions:
MR. WILKENFELD MOVED TO TABLE APPLICATION; MR. BURRISS
SECONDED, AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Joan Hepsworth, 1287 Cherry Valley Road
Mr. Stansbury recused himself from this work session}
Joan Hepsworth and Carolyn Carter wish to open a Massage
Therapy business, entitled New Day Spa. They need to add parking
space behind the building and would remove the garage door and
make outside facade look the same as the wall. The finish would
be painted with a texture to hide the cement block with vinyl
siding on the back. The front door would be flush. They would
remove trees and add shrubs. The existing second curbcut will be
for residences on either side.
Mr. Burriss asked applicants about sign location and lighting, and the want it as close to the road as possible. Ms. Htheepsirworth will approach Cherrry Valley Lodge about access to parking lot. Members would like to see photos. Mr.
Burriss wants to see the parking lot screened, and Ms. Hepsworth will screen it on the residential side.
Consensus liked the plan. The ditch might present a problem. Sidewalks need to be 6- wide but there is not enough space at this point. If Cherry Valley road is improved, the sidewalks would need to be installed by the owner. If there is btoe bceonannecatecdc.ess road in the back, this parking lot would need to
Members asked for information about the sign, its location, proposed screening to the north of parking lot, and photos.
Mr. Wernet appreciates the fact that applicants have looked watorkth. e ordinances and tried to come up with something that will
John Thornborough, SE Corner of Main and College Streets
Mr. Thornborough stated that he wants rezoning to open an artist studio and showroom at 138 North Main. Mr. Stansbury
stated that a work session is not appropriate for a rezoning and that a public hearing should be scheduled.
Finding of Fact:
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO ADOPT THE FINDING FOR A AND B UNDER NEW
BUSINESS (CRATES, BARSOTTI) AS FORMAL FINDING OF FACT. MR.
WILKENFELD SECONDED, AND FINDING OF FACT WAS UNANIMOUSLY
Adjournment: 9: 15 p. m.
Next Meetings: October 26 and November 9 and 23
GRANVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION