GRANVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
Members Present: Keith Myers C( hair)R,ichard Salvage,Bill Wernet,Carl Wilkenfeld
Members Absent: Jack Burriss,Bernie Lukco
Also Present:Kathryn Wimberger,Village Planner
Visitors Present: Shirley Johnson,Dan Leavell
Citizen's Comments: none
The Chair swore in all those who planned to speak.)
Minutes of September 20,1999:
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO APPROVE MINUTES AS PRESENTED;MR.
WILKENFELD SECONDED,AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Minutes of September 27,1999:
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO APPROVE MINUTES AS PRESENTED; MR.
WILKENFELD SECONDED,AND MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY
The Murphy Group,Lot 11220 Wexford Drive -Lot Split
Ms. Wimberger stated that the applicant wishes to arrange a lot split without plat.
She told Shirley Johnson that this would make the lots too small ( zoning standards not
met)and suggested making them part of the adjoining properties on Trinity Court. The
lot split could be approved conditionally.
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATION WITH THE
CONDITION THAT THE PARCEL BEING SPLIT BE COMBINED WITH
LOTS 11219 AND 11218 TO MAKE TWO LARGE LOTS ( REMEDIAL LOT
COMBINATION).MR. WILKENFELD SECONDED,AND MOTION WAS
Dan Leaveil,234 West Elm Street -Shed
The applicant wishes to build a shed in a corner ofthe back yard 5' from side and
rear property lines. It does not need a variance because it is not permanent. Mr. Leavell
stated that he has a small back yard but needs a shed for storage because the garage is
small. The shed will be well hidden behind foliage and will tidy up the yard. It will be a
simple design with an overhang roof,with a little window and little door and T-111 siding.
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATION AS PRESENTED.
MR..WILKENFELD SECONDED,AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY
GPC Minutes,October 6, 1999
Discussion: Ms.Wimberger brought up the issue ofaddressing criteria for approval,
saying that GPC should move to approve and then refer to the specific criteria,i.e.,is the
structure in keeping with the neighborhood;massing;materials. Some concerns raised
were as follows:
Mr. Salvage thought Ms. Wimberger could prepare the Finding ofFacts in advance
Could the standard Finding ofFact just refer to the relevant sections in the code?
This is on the form already}
Approve the Finding ofFact at the next meeting when our meeting is very busy at the
With a disapproval,GPC could prepare a more detailed Finding ofFact
For expediency,could we simply refer to the items on the Planner's agenda?
The secretary or somebody could write these things down at the meeting.
With no objections heard,little reference need be made
This will be addressed further at the next meeting.
Finding of Fact:
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS FOR A and B UNDER
NEW BUSINESSM (urphy and Leavell)AS FORMAL DECISION OF THE
COMMISSION. MR. WILKENFELD SECONDED,AND IT WAS
Next Meetings: i r r(egularM) onday,October 18
November 8 and 22
Sign Code Meetings: November 1 and 15
Adjournment: 7:56 p.m.