GRANVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
Members Present: Jack Burriss,Bernie Lukco,Keith Myers C( hair)R,ichard Salvage,
Members Absent:Cart Wilkenfeld
Also Present:Kathryn Wimberger,Village Planner,Lindsey Mason,Intern
Visitors Present: Scott Rawden SentineD, Ben and Nadine Rader,Dave and Lynne
Kishler,Garrett Moore, Sharon Joseph,Chiropractor-115 N. Prospect,Rodger Kessler,
Don Rife,Debra Lewellyn
Citizen's Comments: none
The Chair swore in all those who planned to speak)
Minutes of June 14,1999:
Add Mr. Wernet's name to " Present"list
After Bank First National,add Locally held businesses should not be held to a
higher standard than non-locally owned businesses.
Page 2, first motion,second line: th"e temporary sign in place until this application
is completed and ( 2)pending revisions from the applicant. Mr. Wilkenfeld seconded...."
Page 3, fifth paragraph: M " r. Wilkenfeld stated that according to the AROD
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO APPROVE MINUTES AS AMENDED. MR.
WERNET SECONDED,AND MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Benjamin and Nadine Rader,311 East College Street
Ms. Wimberger stated that revised plans arrived today and are on the table. BZBA
tabled the variance application,requesting more information.
Mr. Lukco said some neighbors have not been able to review the revisions and are
in opposition to the massing. He thinks the neighbors should be present at any decision
making. Whether GPC reviews this tonight depends on how significant the changes are.
Don Rife, architect, said that the revions made were all in response to comments from
members and neighbors at BZBA
Mr. Salvage thought it should be heard tonight, but Mr. Wernet thought it should
be treated as any other application that comes in with changes. Neighbors were not
notified of changes, and those who would be most impacted should be allowed to hear the
Mr. Wernet asked whether the. Raders would be willing to table this. Mrs. Rader
said Yes but she would like to explain that with the changes,they do not need a variance
any more. They lowered the height ofthe roofby 4' and moved the structure 10' farther
away from property line.
I &74* ,
Don Rife said there would be a utility sink but no plans are made for an apartment. MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO TABLE APPLICATION UNTIL THE NEXT
MEETING. MR. BURRISS SECONDED,AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY
Dave and Lynne Kishler,327 West Elm -Remodel Porch
The applicants would like to redo the porch,adding wood railings instead of
metal. The wood is rotting and needs to be replaced.
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATION. MR. LUKCO
SECONDED,AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED
Vicki and Garrett Moore,207 South Pearl - Fence and Porch
The applicants would like to enclose the front yard with a low-maintenance
wooden picket fence and to screen- in the front porch. The fence would extend to the rear
ofthe house and connect to the garage to keep the children in.
Mr. Burriss wondered why there were two heights listed,and Mr. Moore said they
would gradually increase the height towards the back. They would go with the dog-eared
Mr. Myers asked where the transition from height to height would be, and Mr.
Moore said it was in the front but, after more discussion,thought maybe the fence could
The porch,he added would be wooden with the bottom framed and the top
screened with removable screens for glass.
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATION WITH THE
FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: (1)42"PICKET ALONG NORTH SIDE
PROPERTY LINE,42"TO REAR OF HOUSE,TRANSITIONING TO 60"AT
THE BACK; 2()THAT THE FRONT PORCH ENCLOSURE BE FRAMED
WITH WOOD;3 ()THAT THE DOGE- ARED PICKET AS SKETCHED BE
USED;4 ()THAT THE FENCE BE PAINTED BEIGE OR WHITE WITH
PICKETS FACING OUTWARD. MR. LUKCO SECONDED, AND IT WAS
Sharon L.Joseph, 115 North Prospect -signs
Mr. Wimberger said this was a change of use application as well as a sign. It was
previously a video store and the applicant wants to rent the space to a chiropractor, and
the black and white wooden sign is for her business.
MR..LUKCO MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF USE
FROM VIDEO STORE TO CHIROPRACTOR AND THE SIGN THAT IS
INCLUDED IN APPLICATION BE APPROVED. MR. SALVAGE
SECONDED,AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
GPC Minutes,June 28, 1999
GPC Minutes,June 28,1999
Bank First National,222 East Broadway -Sign
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO TAKE THE BANK FIRST NATIONAL OFF THE
TABLE. MR. LUKCO SECONDED,AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY
Rodger Kessler stated they decided to move the sign from where it was to farther
toward the street to keep it at a lower elevation. They split the signs up with artificial
hooks. The color sample is shown and is darker than the computer color. It would be 6'
from the ground to the top.
Mr. Wernet thought the color was much better than the computer sample and
removed a lot ofthe concern,but Mr. Burriss wanted to see the exact location ofthe sign.
Mr..Kessler said it allows more visibility now.
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO APPROVE APPLICATION SUBJECT TO (1)
THE SIGN BE A MINIMUM OF 3' AWAY FROM THE SIDEWALK AND ( 2)
THE BLUE SHALL MATCH THE COLOR SAMPLE PROVIDED TONIGHT.
MR. LUKCO SECONDED,AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Finding of Fact:
MR. SALVAGE MOVED TO ADOPT THE FINDINGS FOR B,C,D UNDER
NEW BUSINESS ( Kishler,Moore,Joseph)AND A UNDER OLD BUSINESS
Bank First National)AS FORMAL DECISION OF THE COMMISSION. MR.
LUKCO SECONDED,AND IT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Closing Comments:The Chair said that it was suggested to move Minutes to
consideration at end of meeting,but members decided to leave this at the top of the
Members would rather see revisions arrive in a timely enough fashion to be
included in the regular packet instead of appearing at the meeting.
Next Sign Code meeting is July 19.
Next Meetings: July 12 ( Keith and Betty will be absent)and July 26
Adjournment: 8:35 p.m.