Granville Community Calendar

Planning Commission Minutes August 11, 2008

GRANVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION

August 11, 2008

7:00pm

Minutes

 

Members Present: Gina Reeves, Tom Mitchell, Lyle McClow, Tim Ryan (Chair).

Members Absent: Jack Burriss and Councilmember O’Keefe (non-voting).

Staff Present: Village Planner, Alison Terry, and Assistant Law Director, Allison Crites.

Visitors Present: Art Chonko, Kevin Reiner, Chip Blanchard, Louis Middleman, John Noblick, Skip Weiler, Laura Andujar, Leta Ross, Jack Thornborough, Brian Miller, and Seth Patton.

 

Citizen’s Comments:

No one appeared to speak under Citizen’s Comments.

 

Old Business:

240 West Broadway, Art Chonko – Denison University, Application #08-41

VID (Village Institutional District) – AROD (Architectural Review Overlay District)

The application was submitted by Art Chonko on behalf of Denison University.  The request is for approval of exterior site lighting. 

Swearing in of Witnesses – Mr. Ryan swore in Village Planner, Alison Terry, and Art Chonko.

 

Discussion regarding Application #08-41:

Art Chonko, Denison University, stated that they reduced some of the lighting that had originally been proposed in this revised application.  Mr. McClow asked how many of the lights are on a timer.  Mr. Chonko stated that the rail lighting would be on throughout the evening and the rest of the lighting would be on timers and could be turned off.  Ms. Terry stated that the staff report depicts the types of lights and what was previously in place and what was taken away from the original application.  She stated that they are recommending that some of the lights placed on timers be turned off at midnight.  Mr. Mitchell asked if the applicant felt the submitted proposal was enough light.  Mr. Chonko stated yes. 

 

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #08-41:

 

a)      Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  Yes.  Mr. Ryan stated some of the lighting is for information purposes as well as for safety purposes.  Mr. Ryan indicated that some of the current lighting in place is being replaced with lighting more historical in character.  Mr. Mitchell agreed.   

b)      Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  Yes.  Ms. Reeves stated that the proposal is in keeping with the historical character of the Village.

c)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.

d)      Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Ryan stated that the lighting does not appear to be intrusive. 

e)      Materials and Texture:  The Planning Commission concluded that the proposed lighting will be metal fixtures. 

f)        Use of Landscape Design:  The Planning Commission concluded that the proposed lights will be used for accenting landscaping and the proposal is appropriate.

 

Ms. Reeves made a motion to approve Application #08-41, as indicated on the revised drawings dated 7/28/08, only with the following condition:  That all of the light fixtures labeled “SA”, “SF” or “SJ” shall be required to be on a timer, set to be turned off at midnight, or at the end of the event, whichever is later. 

 

Seconded by Mr. Mitchell. 

 

Roll Call Vote: McClow, Reeves, Mitchell, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0. 

 

Application #08-41 is Approved with the above stated condition. 

 

210 West College Street (Cleveland Hall), Art Chonko – Denison University, Application #08-81

VID (Village Institutional District) – AROD (Architectural Review Overlay District)

The application was submitted by Art Chonko on behalf of Denison University.  The request is for approval of exterior modifications to existing Cleveland Hall as follows:

1)         Replacement of true divided lite wood windows with aluminum windows;

2)         Replacement of wood and aluminum doors with aluminum doors;

3)         Installation of ten (10) skylights on top of the pitched roof of the main building;

4)         Installation of four (4) roof hatches on top of pitched roof of the main building,

            adjacent to the skylights;

5)         Replacement of existing brick and metal porch rails on the first and second floor

      levels of the southern elevation with new metal railing; and

            Three (3) additions to existing Cleveland Hall as follows:

1)         Two-story addition attached to the western core building on the north side;

2)         Two-story addition attached to the eastern stone portion of the building; and

3)         Two-story addition on top of the eastern stone portion of the building.

            The request is also for additional sight lighting, dumpster enclosure, and plaza space on the eastern side of the east addition.

Swearing in of Witnesses – Mr. Ryan swore in Village Planner, Alison Terry, Art Chonko, and later Seth Patton.

 

Discussion regarding Application #08-81:

Please refer to the transcript dated “Planning Commission – August 11, 2008” for the discussion and review of Application #08-81. 

 

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approve Application #08-81 with the following conditions:

1)         That approval of the application shall be contingent upon Application #07-003   being withdrawn as to the portions thereof that specifically deal with exterior           modifications and the architectural design of the three new additions proposed to      be made to Cleveland Hall and that were subject to review by the Village under             Chapter 1161 of the Codified Ordinances of the Village.  In addition, no Zoning        and Architectural Permit shall be issued by the Village until such time as      Application #07-003 is withdrawn.  This approval shall expire within one (1) year                      from the date of final approval by the Planning Commission if no Zoning and        Architectural Permit has been issued; and

2)         Also, to be noted is that this application meets the criteria of Chapter 1161.02 as           discussed at the previous meeting.

 

Mr. McClow seconded. 

 

Roll Call Vote: Reeves, Mitchell, McClow, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0.

 

Application #08-81 is Approved with the above stated conditions.

 

240 West Broadway, Denison University, Application #08-101

VID (Village Institutional District) – AROD (Architectural Review Overlay District)

The application was submitted by Art Chonko on behalf of Denison University.  The request is for approval of a temporary banner sign on Burke Hall. 

Swearing in of Witnesses – Mr. Ryan swore in Village Planner, Alison Terry, and Art Chonko.

 

Discussion regarding Application #08-101:

Art Chonko, Denison University, indicated that the sign would be placed on the south side of the building.  Ms. Terry stated that because this is a temporary sign the three code color limit does not apply.  Mr. Chonko stated that the period of time the banner would be up would be September 15th – December 1st.  Ms. Terry stated that “Other Signs” do not have a square footage limit.  Mr. Chonko stated that they would like people to be able to read the sign from the street.  Mr. Ryan asked if temporary banners have been approved in the past for schools and churches. Ms. Terry stated that there has been approval for a larger banner for Welsh Hills School, but it was not as large is this banner.  Mr. Mitchell stated that the size of the banner does seem appropriate considering the size of the building and the distance from the road.  Mr. Chonko stated that a banner consultant worked with Denison and recommended the size of the sign.  Mr. Ryan asked if the applicant can live with a smaller sign.  Mr. Chonko stated that the proposed size is similar to what you may see on a museum in other areas. 

 

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #08-101:

 

a)      Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  Yes.  Ms. Reeves stated that the sign is stylistically compatible with the building it will hang on.  Mr. Mitchell stated that this is a unique structure and it is compatible on a larger scale.

b)      Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission consensus was yes. 

c)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.

d)      Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Ryan stated that the sign will announce what is going on in the building.

 

 

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approve Application #08-101 with the following condition:  That the banner sign shall be valid only until December 1, 2008.

 

Seconded by Ms. Reeves.

 

Roll Call Vote:  Reeves, Mitchell, McClow, Ryan (no).  Motion carried 3-1. 

(Mr. Ryan stated that he voted “No” because he feels the banner is too large.) 

 

Application #08-101 is approved with the above stated condition.

 

Fine Arts Quad, Denison University, Application #08-102

VID (Village Institutional District) – AROD (Architectural Review Overlay District)

The application was submitted by Art Chonko on behalf of Denison University.  The request is for approval of eleven (11) freestanding identification signs and two (2) wall signs.  The Fine Arts Quad includes: Burke Hall, Cleveland Hall, Ace Morgan, Doane Dance, and Burton Hall.

Swearing in of Witnesses – Mr. Ryan swore in Village Planner, Alison Terry, and Art Chonko.

 

Discussion regarding Application #08-102:

Art Chonko indicated that some of the wording could change a little bit, but it will not impact the size or location of the sign.  He stated that Denison University would incur any costs associated with removing any signs that are in the right-of-way.  Ms. Terry stated that the Village Service Director would be available to make sure there are no site distance issues related to the placement of the sign.  Ms. Reeves asked if the new signs would have the same lettering style and the same type of posts.  Mr. Chonko stated yes.  Ms. Terry clarified that the proposal is to remove some of the existing signs and replace some of the signs. Ms. Terry stated that the applicant will need to obtain a right-of-way permit.  She went on to say that a variance would need to be given by the Planning Commission in the approval of this application to allow more than one sign on certain lots.  

 

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #08-102:

 

a)      Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded Yes.

b)      Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission consensus was yes. 

c)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes. Mr. Ryan indicated that people will be able to move about the property easier with directional signs.

d)      Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes. 

e)      Materials and Texture: The Planning Commission stated that all of the materials will be metal fixtures painted black.

f)        Use of Detail: The Planning Commission concluded that the applicant is proposing an additional eleven (11) freestanding identification signs and two (2) wall signs, all to be constructed of metal and painted black.

g)      Signage: To approve Application #08-102, the approval is conditioned upon:  1)  To allow two freestanding signs noted as #1 and #5, Quad Directional Signs, in the submitted application to be located on a single zone lot; 2)  To allow two freestanding signs noted as #6 and #9, Doane Dance Signs, in the submitted application to be located on a single zone lot; 3) To allow two freestanding signs noted as # 7 and #8, Burton Hall Signs, in the submitted application to be located on a single zone lot; and 4) That signs #5, #6, #7, #10 and #13 are subject to an application for a right-of-way permit."    

 

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to the Variance for Application #08-102:

 

a)      That special circumstances or conditions exist which are peculiar to the land or structure(s) involved and which are not applicable to other lands or structures in the same zoning districts.  The Planning Commission concluded Yes.  Mr. Mitchell stated that the Fine Arts Quad is unique and requires additional signage. 

b)      That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this Zoning Ordinance would deprive the applicants of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the provisions of the Ordinance.  The Planning Commission concluded that the situation is peculiar and their answer was Yes. 

c)      That the special conditions and circumstances do not results from the actions of the applicant. The Planning Commission concluded that the circumstances do not result from an action by the applicant. 

d)      That the granting of the variance will not confer on the applicant any undue privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands or structures in the same zoning district.  The Planning Commission stated Yes.  Mr. Ryan added that the Village Institutional District is peculiar in itself and there are no other properties in this same zoning district. 

e)      That the granting of the variance will in no other manner adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the persons residing or working within the vicinity of the proposed variance.  The Planning Commission concluded Yes and stated that no one else has this same zoning – Village Institutional District.

 

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approve Application #08-102, with the approval being conditioned upon the following:

1)         To allow two freestanding signs noted as #1 & #5, Quad Directional Signs, in the          submitted application, to be located on a single zone lot;
2)         To allow two freestanding signs noted as #6 & #9, Doane Dance Signs, in the   submitted application to be located on a single zone lot;

3)         To allow two freestanding signs noted as #7 & #8, Burton Hall Signs, in the       submitted application, to be located on a single zone lot; and

4)         Signs #5, #6, #7, #10, &  #13 are subject to application for a right-of-way permit.

 

Seconded by Ms. Reeves.

 

Roll Call Vote:  Mitchell, Reeves, McClow, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0. 

 

Application #08-102 is approved with the above stated conditions. 

 

New Business:

223 East Elm Street, Keith and Courtney McWalter, Application #08-94

VRD (Village Residential District) – AROD (Architectural Review Overlay District)

The application was submitted by Kevin Reiner on behalf of Keith and Courtney McWalter.  The applicant is requesting approval of an exterior modification to the house including shutters, six foot privacy fence and pergola, flagstone walkway and a generator.

Swearing in of Witnesses – Mr. Ryan swore in Village Planner, Alison Terry, and Kevin Reiner.

 

Discussion regarding Application #08-94:

Kevin Reiner, West Broadway, stated that they would like to install louvered Timberlane historical shutters made from wood.  Mr. Ryan asked about the color.  Mr. Reiner was unsure as to the final color.  He went on to explain that they are also proposing a six foot privacy fence with lattice at the top.   Mr. Reiner indicated that the fence would be cedar and finished on both sides.  Mr. Reiner stated that they are also proposing a steel pergola and they hope that this will be covered with green wisteria.  Mr. Ryan asked if the pergola is included in the lot coverage.  Ms. Terry stated that it is not considered an impervious surface and it is not part of the lot coverage.  She also stated that the lot coverage is 37.92% with the proposal, meeting the Code’s maximum 50% requirement.  Mr. Reiner stated that they would like to install flagstone for walkways and the garden area.  He indicated that they would like to remove existing brick in the front and replace it with the flagstone.  Mr. Reiner stated that they will also be applying for a variance for a setback to accommodate the proposed generator. 

 

Brian Blanchard, 221 South Pearl Street, stated that he would like to complement the applicant on the job done so far.  He stated that he has no problem with the fence or proposal overall.

 

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #08-94:

a)      Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the

Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded Yes. 

b)      Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded Yes and it is compatible with a previous plan approved for the on-going renovation.

c)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.

d)      Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.

e)      Materials and Texture:  The Planning Commission concluded that the Materials and Textures are complimentary to the style and design of the existing structure. 

  1. a.      Shutters – Timberlane, Louver shutters, wood
  2. b.      Pergola – Steel
  3. c.       Fence and Gate – Cedar
  4. d.      Landscape Border – Sandstone
  5. e.       Air Conditioner
  6. f.        Generator

f)        Use of Details: The Planning Commission concluded that the applicant is proposing the following:

  1. a.       Installation of a generator
  2. b.      Two air-conditioning units
  3. c.       A six foot (6’) privacy fence and gate
  4. d.      Steel pergola
  5. e.       Flagstone walkways and sandstone border
  6. f.        Shutters

g)      Use of Live Plant Material: The applicant is prosing to use box woods to screen the air-conditioning units.  The applicant is also proposing a generator that would be screened by a six foot side yard privacy fence – however a variance would need to be given for the placement of the generator. 

h)      Use of Landscape Design:  The applicant is proposing landscaping in the form of plant material, pea gravel walkways, flagstone walkways, a sandstone border along the perimeter of many of the planting areas, a pergola in the rear yard, a six foot (6’) privacy fence along the eastern setback and between the rear yard and parking/garage area. 

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. Reeves made a motion to approve Application #08-94 with the following conditions:

1)                  The fence is to be finished and painted on both sides; and

2)                  That the applicant shall obtain a side yard setback variance from the Board of Zoning and Building Appeals for the proposed generator location, or will need to bring it into compliance with the ten foot (10’) side yard setback requirement;

 

Seconded by Mr. Mitchell.   

 

Roll Call Vote:  McClow, Reeves, Mitchell, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0. 

 

Application #08-94 is approved with the above stated conditions. 

 

110 West Broadway, First Presbyterian Church, Application #08-95

VSD (Village Square District) – AROD (Architectural Review Overlay District).  The application was submitted by Jerry McClain Construction on behalf of First Presbyterian Church for architectural review and approval of replacement of north double doors with new double doors and glass transom. 

Swearing in of Witnesses – Mr. Ryan swore in Village Planner, Alison Terry, and John Noblick.

 

Discussion regarding Application #08-95:

John Noblick, Jerry McClain Company, Newark, stated that they would like to remove the north doors.  He stated that the new doors will match several other doors on the existing building.  Mr. Noblick indicated that any trim work already around the door would remain.  Mr. Ryan asked if the proposed doors would be wood.  Mr. Noblick stated yes.  Ms. Reeves asked how this is a change to what is currently there.  Ms. Terry stated that the new doors will match what is on the other side of the building and there is currently not a transom on the existing north doors. 

 

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #08-95:

 

a)      Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.      

b)      Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes. 

c)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.

d)      Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.

e)      Materials and Texture: The applicant is proposing that the doors be made out of wood – two panel.

 

Ms. Reeves made a motion to Approve Application #08-95 as submitted.

 

Seconded by Mr. McClow. 

 

Roll Call Vote: McClow, Mitchell, Reeves, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0.   

 

Application #08-95 is approved as submitted. 

 

203 South Cherry Street, Louis Middleman, Application #08-96

VRD (Village Residential District) – AROD (Architectural Review Overlay District)

The application was submitted by Louis Middleman and the applicant is requesting approval of exterior modifications to the rear accessory structure, specifically  replacement with Hardie-Plank siding and MiraTEC trim. 

Swearing in of Witnesses – Mr. Ryan swore in Village Planner, Alison Terry and Louis Middleman.

 

Discussion regarding Application #08-96:

Louis Middleman, 203 South Cherry Street, stated that he has been told by the contractor that the wood siding will not take paint and it is not rotted throughout.  He explained that the contractor will not need to remove the current siding, but rather will cover it.  Mr. Mitchell asked why the applicant needs to apply for approval since the structure will look identical to what is currently in place.  Ms. Terry stated that the new material is a composite and not wood – which is what is currently in place.  Mr. Ryan asked if the existing detailing will remain.  Mr. Middleman stated yes and the garage doors, gutters, down spouts, and lighting will all remain the same.  Mr. Ryan asked if the applicant had considered replacing the siding with wood.  Mr. Middleman stated that he was told that hardi-plank would take the paint better and last longer. 

 

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #08-96:

 

a)      Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes. 

b)      Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes. 

c)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.

d)      Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.

e)      Materials and Texture: Hardi-plank.  Ms. Reeves added that this material will closely match what is currently in place.

f)        Use of Details: The applicant is proposing Hardi-Plank to install on top of the existing siding.

 

Ms. Reeves made a motion to approve Application #08-96 as submitted.

 

Seconded by Mr. Mitchell.

 

Roll Call Vote:  Mitchell, Reeves, McClow, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0. 

 

Application #08-96 is approved as submitted. 

 

484 South Main Street, Ross Granville Market, Application #07-083

*AMENDMENT*

SBD (Suburban Business District)

The application was submitted by RCS Design, Ltd. on behalf of Ross’ Granville Market and the applicant is requesting an amendment for modifications to the front addition previously approved.

Swearing in of Witnesses – Mr. Ryan swore in Village Planner, Alison Terry, Laura Andujar, and Leta Ross.

 

Discussion regarding Application #07-083:

Laura Andujar, RCS Design Ltd., explained the proposed modifications and provided samples of the proposed materials.  Ms. Andujar stated that the low pitch on the roof will not allow for the shingles and that is why they are proposing standing seam metal.  She stated that the color of the standing seam metal would be ‘Slate Gray.’  Ms. Andujar noticed a mistake in the location and number of columns on the paperwork that was submitted.  She explained the exact location of the columns to the Planning Commission.  Ms. Andujar stated that the reason for adding a column is because they came across an existing drain line and modifications are necessary. 

 

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approve the amendment to Application #07-083 on the condition that the applicant shall be required to receive a variance from the BZBA for the difference in the roof pitch.  Seconded Ms. Reeves.

 

Roll Call Vote:  Mitchell, McClow, Reeves, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0. 

 

The amendment to Application #07-083 is approved with the above stated condition. 

 

2780 Newark-Granville Road, JVB Group, Application #08-98

PUD (Planned Unit Development)

The application was submitted by the Robert Weiler Company on behalf of JVB Group and the applicant is requesting approval of a temporary real estate sign.

Swearing in of Witnesses – Mr. Ryan swore in Village Planner, Alison Terry and Skip Weiler.

 

Discussion regarding Application #08-98:

Skip Weiler, Robert Weiler Company, 41 South High Street, Columbus, stated that they are eager to sell the property and would like to place a real estate for sale sign up as soon as possible. 

 

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approve Application #08-98 on the condition that the sign shall be placed outside of the right-of-way, parallel to State Route 16.  Seconded by Mr. McClow.

 

Roll Call Vote:  McClow, Reeves, Mitchell, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0. 

 

Application #08-98 is approved with the above stated condition. 

 

221 South Pearl Street, Brian D. Blanchard, Application #08-99

VRD (Village Residential District), AROD (Architectural Review Overlay District)

The application was submitted by Brian D. Blanchard and the request is for architectural review and approval of an air-conditioning unit. 

Swearing in of Witnesses – Mr. Ryan swore in Village Planner, Alison Terry, and Brian (Chip) D. Blanchard.

 

Discussion regarding Application #08-99:

Chip Blanchard, 221 South Pearl Street, stated that he had hoped to place the air-conditioning unit elsewhere, but this was his only option without requesting a variance – which he did not want to do.  Mr. Ryan asked if the unit would be screened.  Mr. Blanchard stated that he has planted some box woods.  He stated that he would be willing to install balusters on the stairs if needed.  Mr. Ryan noted landscaping also on the north property line along the alley. 

 

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #08-99:

 

g)      Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes. 

h)      Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes. 

i)        Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.

j)        Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.

k)      Materials and Textures: The applicant has indicated that they would like to install an air-conditioning unit in the rear western yard.  They have indicated that they would screen the unit with box woods.

l)        Landscaping:  The applicant has indicated that he has installed some box woods and there is existing landscaping in place.

 

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approve Application #08-99 as submitted.

Seconded by Mr. McClow.

 

Roll Call Vote:  McClow, Reeves (no), Mitchell, Ryan.  Motion carried 3-1. 

(Ms. Reeves stated that she voted “no” because she didn’t felt he air conditioning unit was adequately screened).

 

Application #08-99 is approved as submitted. 

 

Finding of Fact Approvals:

Old Business:

Application #08-41:

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

Mr. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #08-41.  Seconded by Ms. Reeves. 

Roll Call Vote: McClow, Mitchell, Reeves, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0.

 

Application #08-81:

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

Mr. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #08-81.  Seconded by Mr. McClow. 

Roll Call Vote: McClow, Mitchell, Reeves, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0.

 

Application #08-101:

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

Ms. Reeves moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #08-101.  Seconded by Mr. Mitchell. 

Roll Call Vote: McClow, Mitchell, Reeves, Ryan (no).  Motion carried 3-1.

 

Application #08-102:

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

Ms. Reeves moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #08-102.  Seconded by Mr. Mitchell. 

Roll Call Vote: McClow, Mitchell, Reeves, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0.

 

New Business:

Application #08-94:

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

Ms. Reeves moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #08-94.  Seconded by Mr. McClow. 

Roll Call Vote: McClow, Mitchell, Reeves, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0.

 

Application #08-95:

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

Ms. Reeves moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #08-95.  Seconded by Mr. McClow. 

Roll Call Vote: McClow, Mitchell, Reeves, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0.

 

Application #08-96:

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

Ms. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #08-96.  Seconded by Ms. Reeves. 

Roll Call Vote: McClow, Mitchell, Reeves, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0.

 

Application #07-083 - AMENDENT:

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

Mr. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #07-083.  Seconded by Ms. Reeves. 

Roll Call Vote: McClow, Mitchell, Reeves, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0.

 

Application #08-98:

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

Mr. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #08-98.  Seconded by Mr. McClow. 

Roll Call Vote: McClow, Mitchell, Reeves, Ryan.  Motion carried 4-0.

 

Application #08-99:

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

Mr.  Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #08-99.  Seconded by Mr. McClow. 

Roll Call Vote: McClow, Mitchell, Reeves (no), Ryan.  Motion carried 3-1.

 

Motion to Approve absent Planning Commission Members:

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to excuse Jack Burriss from the August 11th Planning Commission meeting.  Seconded by Mr. McClow.  Motion carried 4-0.

 

Approval of the Minutes:

July 14, 2008

Ms. Reeves moved to approve the July 14, 2008 minutes as presented.  Seconded by Mr. McClow.  Motion carried 3-0, with one abstention (Mr. Mitchell).

 

Adjournment:  9: 15 PM. 

Mr. Mitchell moved to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting, seconded by Ms. Reeves.  Motion carried 4-0. 

 

Next meetings:

August 25, 2008 (Councilmember O’Keefe will not be able to attend.)

September 8, 2008

Employee Payroll / Compensation

The Village has thirty-six (36) full-time employees, 16 regular part-time employees and seaonal employees. Village Personnel Policy

Go to My Pay Stub and login.