Granville Community Calendar

Planning Commission Minutes June 14, 2010

GRANVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION

June 14, 2010

7:00pm

Minutes

 

Members Present: Tim Ryan (Chair), Tom Mitchell (Vice-Chair), Jeremy Johnson, and Councilmember O’Keefe (non-voting).

Members Absent: Jack Burriss.

Staff Present: Village Planner Alison Terry; Law Director Michael Crites, Clerk of Council Mollie Prasher

Visitors Present: Jack Reynolds, Kris and Socrates Goumas, John Noblick, Patricia Armstrong, George Martin, Roger Kessler, Jim Fowler, Matt Ackerman, Jim Green, Dave Getreu, Brian Miller

Citizens’ Comments:

No one appeared to speak during Citizen’s Comments.

Public Hearing:

1919 Lancaster Road/Mill District – Metropolitan Partners - Application #2010-87

Mr. Mitchell recused himself from the meeting.  Law Director Crites indicated that he had spoken with Mr. Mitchell and concurred with his decision.   Due to Mr. Mitchell’s recusal, the Commission did not have a quorum and could not take testimony.  Law Director Crites recommended that the Commission should reschedule the hearing.  Chair Ryan advised Jack Reynolds, counsel for Metropolitan Partners, of the need to reschedule the hearing to the next Planning Commission meeting on June 28, 2010.   Community members in attendance were also advised of the reason for cancelling the hearing.  The Commission asked if there were community members in attendance who were interested in testifying at the public hearing.  No one indicated interest in speaking.

New Business:

226 E. Broadway – Goumas Confections - Application #2010-81

Village Business District (VBD) – Architectural Review Overlay District (AROD).  The request is for review and approval of a Change of Use for 890 square feet from Category "E", Retail Outlets to Category "B", Specialty Shops, specifically for a candy store.      

Swearing in of Witnesses – Chair Ryan swore in Planner Terry and Socrates Goumas. 

Discussion regarding Application #2010-81:

Soc Goumas, 224 E. Broadway, indicated that he would like to move the store to the building next door, the space previously occupied by Noir Boutique, due to the need for increased space.  Planner Terry indicated that there were no issues involving off street parking.   

Mr. Johnson made a motion to approve Application #2010-81 as submitted.  Second by Mr. Mitchell. Roll Call Vote: Ryan, Mitchell, Johnson.  Motion carried 3-0.

226 East Broadway – Goumas Confections - Application #2010-82

Village Business District (VBD) – Architectural Review Overlay District (AROD).  The request is for architectural review and approval of a 10.67 square foot freestanding tenant panel sign.

Swearing in of Witnesses – Chair Ryan swore in Planner Terry and Socrates Goumas. 

Discussion regarding Application #2010-82:

Soc Goumas, 224 E. Broadway, indicated that he wanted to move the panel from his existing sign, paint the Noir sign, and install the panel sign.  Planner Terry indicated that the applicant is proposing refacing the existing freestanding wood sign and adding the sign foam tenant panel from their existing sign.  The sign is 10.67 square feet. 

Mr. Johnson asked if the proposed sign would be lighted.  Mr. Goumas indicated that he would like to light the sign in the same manner as his existing sign.  Planner Terry indicated that this current application could be amended to include lighting.

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #2010-82:

a)      Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Mitchell stated that as the sign already exists next door it would certainly be compatible with all other signage.  All members concurred. 

b)      Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Mitchell stated that by contributing to a structure within the District, it contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the area.  All members concurred. 

c)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Mitchell stated that by contributing to the vitality of a member of the District, it contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  All members concurred.

d)      Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Mitchell s stated that it is consistent with signs that existed historically.  All members concurred.

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approve Application #2010-82 as submitted. Second by Mr. Johnson. Roll Call Vote: Mitchell, Johnson, Ryan.  Motion carried 3-0.

226 East Broadway – Goumas Confections - Application #2010-83

Village Business District (VBD) – Architectural Review Overlay District (AROD)  The request is for architectural review and approval of a wall sign.

Swearing in of Witnesses – Chair Ryan swore in Planner Terry and Socrates Goumas.

Discussion regarding Application #2010-83:

Soc Goumas, 226 East Broadway, indicated that he was moving his current wall panel to the new location and hanging it from the soffit. 

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #2010-83:

a)      Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Mitchell stated that as the sign already exists next door it would certainly be compatible with all other signage.  All members concurred. 

b)      Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that as it is the same sign that was approved at 224 East Broadway, it contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the District.  All members concurred.  

c)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that the previously approved sign contributed and this sign will as well.  All members concurred.

d)      Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Mitchell stated that it protects and enhances the viability of the structure and business.  All members concurred.

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approve Application #2010-83 as submitted.  Second by Mr. Johnson. Roll Call Vote: Johnson, Ryan, Mitchell.  Motion carried 3-0. 

131 W. Broadway – John Noblick on behalf of Russ and Melissa Bow - Application #2010-86

Village Residential District (VRD) – Architectural Review Overlay District (AROD) The request is for architectural review and approval of the removal of an existing 15-pane window, divided light wood mandoor replaced with a Masonite mandoor with four panels and a half round divided window at the top, to be located on the western elevation adjacent to the garage.

Swearing in of Witnesses – Chair Ryan swore in Planner Terry and John Noblick.  

Discussion regarding Application #2010-86:

John Noblick, Pataskala, indicated that he worked for the contractor of the proposed project.  Mr. Noblick stated that he would be replacing the existing 15-pane garage service door with a Masonite door, jam and hardware. 

Mr. Mitchell asked if the door would now coordinate with the other existing door and windows of the residence.  Mr. Noblick answered in the affirmative.  He stated that many of the other doors and windows had the arched architectural design and the homeowners wanted to maintain that continuity. 

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #2010-86:

a)      Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Mitchell stated that this door would be consistent with the other doors and windows on the structure.  All members concurred.  

b)      Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Mitchell stated that the door was consistent with the other doors and windows on the structure contributing to the improvement and upgrading.  All members concurred  

c)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Mitchell stated that by being more consistent with the other adjacent windows, it contributes to the continuing vitality.  All members concurred.

d)      Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Mitchell stated the change enhanced an existing structure in the District.  All members concurred.

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approval of Application #2010-86 as submitted.  Second by Mr. Johnson. Roll Call Vote: Ryan, Mitchell, Johnson.  Motion carried 3-0.

214 South Cherry Street –Jim and Bonny Fowler - Application #2010-88

Village Residential District (VRD) – Architectural Review Overlay District (AROD).  The property is located at 214 South Cherry Street, zoned Village Residential District (VRD) and located within the Architectural Review Overlay District (AROD). The request if for architectural review and approval of a wrought iron handrail in the rear yard.

Swearing in of Witnesses – Chair Ryan swore in Planner Terry and Jim Fowler. 

Discussion regarding Application #2010-88:

Jim Fowler, 214 South Cherry Street, indicated that he was adding a wrought iron hand rail on one side of the steps leading into his backyard as pictured in the Commission’s packet materials.

Mr. Johnson asked how the railing would be installed.  Mr. Fowler indicated that a cement pad would be poured for the three base poles and mounted to the concrete.

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #2010-88:

a)      Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that the railing was consistent with other railings in the District.  All members concurred. 

b)      Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that the railing contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historic character of the residence.  All members concurred. 

c)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that the railing will improve the safety of the property thereby contributing to the continuing vitality of the District.  All members concurred.

d)      Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that the wrought iron railing was indicative of materials used by past generations.  All members concurred.

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approve Application #2010-88 as submitted.  Second by Mr. Johnson. Roll Call Vote: Mitchell, Johnson, Ryan.  Motion carried 3-0.

527 Newark-Granville Road –Matt Ackermann/RE/MAX - Application #2010-89

Village Business District (VBD) – Architectural Review Overlay District (AROD)  The request is for architectural review and approval of a 5.14 square foot tenant panel sign to be located on the existing freestanding sign.  

Swearing in of Witnesses – Chair Ryan swore in Planner Terry.  No one appeared for the applicant. 

Discussion regarding Application #2010-89:

Planner Terry advised the Commission that the replacement sign would be utilizing corrugated plastic, which was the same material that was currently used on the existing sign.  Mr. Mitchell suggested tabling the discussion of application #2010-89 and asking the applicant for more information regarding the construction of the sign as replacing the sign with current materials may not be acceptable to the Commission.

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to table Application #2010-89.  Second by Mr. Johnson. Roll Call Vote: Johnson, Ryan, Mitchell.  Motion carried 3-0.

221 North Pearl Street –Jim Green - Application #2010-90

Village Residential District (VRD) – Architectural Review Overlay District (AROD)  The request is for architectural review and approval of the following:  removal of 3-tab asphaltic shingles and replacement with Certain Teed dimensional asphaltic shingles in Georgetown Gray; and the removal of half round and modern gutters, replacing with aluminum 6” half round gutters and round downspouts in a bronze color. 

Swearing in of Witnesses – Chair Ryan swore in Planner Terry and Jim Green. 

Discussion regarding Application #2010-90:

Jim Green, 221 North Pearl Street,  indicated that he would be replacing all of the shingles on his home with dimensional shingles and replacing all of the gutters using half round gutters.

Mr. Ryan asked if the gutters would all be the same color.  Mr. Green answered in the affirmative.  Mr. Johnson asked how the roof would be vented.  Mr. Green indicated that there would now be a ridge vent.  He will eventually vent the soffits at the time he painted the entire house.  Mr. Mitchell asked how the valleys would be handled.  Mr. Green indicated that snow and ice guards would be place on the eaves and valleys and the shingles would be weaved in the valleys at various points where the roof pitch met.

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #2010-90:

a)      Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated the roof and gutters were compatible with other approved roof and gutter projects.  All members concurred.  

b)      Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that the project contributed to the improvement and upgrading of the District.  All members concurred.  

c)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that the vitality of the district is enhanced by the restoration of the structure.  All members concurred.

d)      Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that a new roof will protect and enhance the structure.  All members concurred.

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approve Application #2010-90 as submitted.   Second by Mr. Johnson. Roll Call Vote: Ryan, Mitchell, Johnson.  Motion carried 3-0. 

121 East Broadway – Greg Ream - Application #2010-35 AMENDED

Village Business District (VBD) – Architectural Review Overlay District (AROD). The request is for architectural review and approval of a change to the background colorof a previously approved wall sign from a cream color (PMS 4545) to an off-white color (PMS 7401).

Swearing in of Witnesses – Chair Ryan swore in Planner Terry and Rodger Kessler.

Discussion regarding Application #2010-35:

Rodger Kessler, 170 Pinehurst Drive, appeared on behalf of the applicant.

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #2010-35:

a)      Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that the change in background color was consistent and compatible with the other new renovated and older signs.  Mr. Ryan indicated that the only change in this previously approved sign was in the background color.  All members concurred. 

b)      Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that by contributing to the improvement and upgrading of the building it improved the historical character.  All members concurred. 

c)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Burriss stated that the vitality of the district is enhanced by contributing to the continuing vitality of the building.  All members concurred.

d)      Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that this change protects and enhances the building and economic viability of the District. All members concurred.

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approve Application #2010-35 AMENDED as submitted. Second by Mr. Johnson. Roll Call Vote: Mitchell, Johnson, Ryan.  Motion carried 3-0.

123 East Broadway – Greg Ream - Application #2010-36 AMENDED

Village Business District (VBD) – Architectural Review Overlay District (AROD). The request is for architectural review and approval of a change to the background color of a previously approved wall sign from a cream color (PMS 4545) to an off-white color (PMS 7401).

Swearing in of Witnesses – Chair Ryan swore in Planner Terry and Rodger Kessler. 

Discussion regarding Application #2010-36:

Rodger Kessler, 170 Pinehurst Drive, appeared on behalf of the applicant.

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #2010-36:

e)      Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that the change in background color was consistent and compatible with the other new renovated and older signs.  All members concurred. 

f)        Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that by contributing to the improvement and upgrading of the building it improved the historical character.  All members concurred. 

g)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Burriss stated that the vitality of the district is enhanced by contributing to the continuing vitality of the building.  All members concurred.

h)      Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that this change protects and enhances the building and economic viability of the District. All members concurred.

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approve Application #2010-36 AMENDED as submitted. Second by Mr. Johnson. Roll Call Vote: Mitchell, Johnson, Ryan.  Motion carried 3-0.

125 East Broadway – Greg Ream - Application #2010-37 AMENDED

Village Business District (VBD) – Architectural Review Overlay District (AROD).  The request is for architectural review and approval of a change to the background color of a previously approved wall sign from a cream color (PMS 4545) to an off-white color (PMS 7401).

Swearing in of Witnesses – Chair Ryan swore in Planner Terry and Rodger Kessler. 

Discussion regarding Application #2010-37:

Rodger Kessler, 170 Pinehurst Drive, appeared on behalf of the applicant.

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #2010-37:

i)        Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that the change in background color was consistent and compatible with the other new renovated and older signs.  Mr. Ryan indicated that the only change in this previously approved sign was in the background color.  All members concurred. 

j)        Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that by contributing to the improvement and upgrading of the building it improved the historical character.  All members concurred. 

k)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Burriss stated that the vitality of the district is enhanced by contributing to the continuing vitality of the building.  All members concurred.

l)        Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that this change protects and enhances the building and economic viability of the District. All members concurred.

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approve Application #2010-37 AMENDED as submitted. Second by Mr. Johnson. Roll Call Vote: Mitchell, Johnson, Ryan.  Motion carried 3-0.

127 East Broadway – Greg Ream - Application #2010-38 AMENDED

Village Business District (VBD) – Architectural Review Overlay District (AROD).  The request is for architectural review and approval of a change to the background color of a previously approved wall sign from a cream color (PMS 4545) to an off-white color (PMS 7401).

Swearing in of Witnesses – Chair Ryan swore in Planner Terry and Rodger Kessler.

Discussion regarding Application #2010-38:

Rodger Kessler, 170 Pinehurst Drive, appeared on behalf of the applicant.

The Planning Commission reviewed the Standards and Criteria pertaining to Application #2010-38:

m)    Is stylistically compatible with other new, renovated and old structures in the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that the change in background color was consistent and compatible with the other new renovated and older signs.  Mr. Ryan indicated that the only change in this previously approved sign was in the background color.  All members concurred. 

n)      Contributes to the improvement and upgrading of the historical character of the Village District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that by contributing to the improvement and upgrading of the building it improved the historical character.  All members concurred. 

o)      Contributes to the continuing vitality of the District.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Burriss stated that the vitality of the district is enhanced by contributing to the continuing vitality of the building.  All members concurred.

p)      Protects and enhances examples of the physical surroundings in which past generations lived.  The Planning Commission concluded yes.  Mr. Johnson stated that this change protects and enhances the building and economic viability of the District. All members concurred.

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to approve Application #2010-38 AMENDED as submitted. Second by Mr. Johnson, Roll Call Vote: Mitchell, Johnson, Ryan.  Motion carried 3-0. Mr. Johnson moved to remove Application #2010-89 from the table.  Second by Mr. Mitchell.  Roll Call Vote:  Ryan, Mitchell, Johnson.  Motion carried 3-0

527 Newark-Granville Road –Matt Ackermann/RE/MAX - Application #2010-89

Village Business District (VBD) – Architectural Review Overlay District (AROD) The request is for architectural review and approval of a 5.14 square foot tenant panel sign to be located on the existing freestanding sign.  

Swearing in of Witnesses – Chair Ryan swore in Planner Terry and Matt Ackerman 

Matt Ackerman, 527 Newark-Granville Road, indicated the he was planning to removed the existing sign and replace it with a corrugated plastic RE/MAX sign. 

Discussion regarding Application #2010-89:

Mr. Mitchell asked the applicant if the sign material would be the same as the existing sign material.  Mr. Ackerman indicated in the affirmative.  Mr. Mitchell indicated that the existing sign material was not attractive and had not weathered well.  Mr. Ryan suggested making their sign part of the existing wooden sign.  Planner Terry asked the Commission if they would like to table this application until the June 28, 2010 meeting to allow the applicant to provide samples of the sign materials.  Mr. Ackerman asked about temporary signage.  Planner Terry indicated that a temporary sign permit could be requested.  

Mr. Mitchell made a motion to table Application #2010-89.  Second by Mr. Johnson. Roll Call Vote: Mitchell, Johnson, Ryan.  Motion carried 3-0. 

Finding of Fact Approvals:

New Business:

Application #2010-81: Goumas Confections; Change of Use

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

The Planning Commission found the request to be consistent with The Granville Codified Ordinances Chapter 1159, Village District, Chapter 1161, Architectural Review Overlay District and hereby gives their approval of Application #2010-81 as submitted by the applicant.

Mr. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #2010-81.  Second by Mr. Johnson. Vote to approve Application #2010-81.  Motion carried 3-0. 

Application #2010-82: Goumas Confections; Tenant Panel Sign

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

The Planning Commission found the request to be consistent with The Granville Codified Ordinances Chapter 1159, Village District, Chapter 1161, Architectural Review Overlay District and hereby gives their approval of Application #2010-82 as submitted by the applicant. 

Mr. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #2010-82.  Second by Mr. Johnson. Vote to approve Application #2010-82.  Motion carried 3-0. 

Application #2010-83: Goumas Confections; Wall Sign

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

The Planning Commission found the request to be consistent with The Granville Codified Ordinances Chapter 1159, Village District, Chapter 1161, Architectural Review Overlay District and hereby gives their approval of Application #2010-83 as submitted by the applicant. 

Mr. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #2010-83.  Second by Mr. Johnson. Vote to approve Application #2010-83.  Motion carried 3-0. 

Application #2010-86: John Noblick/Russ and Melissa Bow; Door Replacement

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

The Planning Commission found the request to be consistent with The Granville Codified Ordinances Chapter 1159, Village District, Chapter 1161, Architectural Review Overlay District, and hereby gives their approval of Application #2010-86 as submitted by the applicant. 

Mr. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #2010-826.  Second by Mr. Johnson. Vote to approve Application #2010-86.  Motion carried 3-0. 

Application #2010-35: Greg Ream; Wall Sign

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

The Planning Commission found the request to be consistent with The Granville Codified Ordinances Chapter 1159, Village District, Chapter 1161, Architectural Review Overlay District, and hereby gives their approval of Application #2010-35 as submitted by the applicant. 

Mr. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #2010-35.  Second by Mr. Johnson. Vote to approve Application #2010-35.  Motion carried 3-0. 

Application #2010-36: Greg Ream; Wall Sign

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

The Planning Commission found the request to be consistent with The Granville Codified Ordinances Chapter 1159, Village District, Chapter 1161, Architectural Review Overlay District, and hereby gives their approval of Application #2010-36 as submitted by the applicant. 

Mr. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #2010-36.  Second by Mr. Johnson. Vote to approve Application #2010-36.  Motion carried 3-0. 

Application #2010-37: Greg Ream; Wall Sign

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

The Planning Commission found the request to be consistent with The Granville Codified Ordinances Chapter 1159, Village District, Chapter 1161, Architectural Review Overlay District, and hereby gives their approval of Application #2010-37 as submitted by the applicant. 

Mr. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #2010-37.  Second by Mr. Johnson. Vote to approve Application #2010-37.  Motion carried 3-0. 

Application #2010-38: Greg Ream; Wall Sign

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

The Planning Commission found the request to be consistent with The Granville Codified Ordinances Chapter 1159, Village District, Chapter 1161, Architectural Review Overlay District, and hereby gives their approval of Application #2010-38 as submitted by the applicant. 

Mr. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #2010-38.  Second by Mr. Johnson. Vote to approve Application #2010-38.  Motion carried 3-0. 

Application #2010-88: Jim and Bonny Fowler; Exterior Modifications

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

The Planning Commission found the request to be consistent with The Granville Codified Ordinances Chapter 1159, Village District, Chapter 1161, Architectural Review Overlay District, and hereby gives their approval of Application #2010-88 as submitted by the applicant. 

Mr. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #2010-88.  Second by Mr. Johnson.Vote to approve Application #2010-88.  Motion carried 3-0.

 Application #2010-90: Jim Green; Roofing/Gutters

Approve Findings of Fact and Associated Standards and Criteria.

The Planning Commission found the request to be consistent with The Granville Codified Ordinances Chapter 1159, Village District, Chapter 1161, Architectural Review Overlay District, and hereby gives their approval of Application #2010-90 as submitted by the applicant. 

Mr. Mitchell moved to approve the Findings of Fact for Application #2010-90.  Second by Mr. Johnson.Vote to approve Application #2010-90.  Motion carried 3-0. 

Approval of Absent Commission Member(s):

Mr. Johnson made a motion to excuse Mr. Burriss from the Planning Commission meeting on June 14, 2010.  Second by Mr.  Mitchell. Motion carried 3-0.  

Approval of the Minutes:

As there was not a quorum of members present who had attended the May 24, 2010 meeting, the minutes will be approved at the June 28, 2010 meeting.  Mr. Ryan noted that Mr. Mitchell sworn in all witnesses during the May 24, 2010 meeting. 

Adjournment:  8:20 PM

Mr. Johnson moved to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting, Second by Mr. Mitchell.  Motion carried 3-0.   

Next meetings:  

June 28, 2010

July 12, 2010

Employee Payroll / Compensation

The Village has thirty-six (36) full-time employees, 16 regular part-time employees and seaonal employees. Village Personnel Policy

Go to My Pay Stub and login.